Data for: Exploring the comparative adequacy of a unimanual and a bimanual stimulus-response setup for use with three-alternative choice response time tasksdoi:10.18710/LEMWJ0DataverseNO2022-09-202Öttl, Anton; Kim, Jonathan; Behne, Dawn; Gygax, Pascal; Hyönä, Jukka; Gabriel, Ute, 2022, "Data for: Exploring the comparative adequacy of a unimanual and a bimanual stimulus-response setup for use with three-alternative choice response time tasks", https://doi.org/10.18710/LEMWJ0, DataverseNO, V2Data for: Exploring the comparative adequacy of a unimanual and a bimanual stimulus-response setup for use with three-alternative choice response time tasksdoi:10.18710/LEMWJ0Öttl, AntonKim, JonathanBehne, DawnGygax, PascalHyönä, JukkaGabriel, UteNTNU – Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyFRIPRO 240881DataverseNONTNU – Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyGabriel, UteKim, Jonathan2022-09-15Social SciencesPsychologyPsycholinguisticsStimulus-ResponseGender AssociationsResponse setups for use with three+ alternative choice designs offer competing conceptualizations that stimulus-response setups can draw from, especially as paradigm complexity increases. We explore this topic through comparing a unimanual (Experiment 1, N = 34) and a bimanual response setup (Experiment 2, N = 32) for use with a complex three-alternative forced choice task. Crucially, one of the stimulus categories (‘mixed’) was composed of stimulus elements from the other two stimulus categories used in that task. A simple three-alternative forced choice task (reference button task) was included to isolate the motoric component of response registration. This dataset contains ten files; two RStudio code files allowing for easy replication of how the analyses was conducted, two .txt containing this code, five datafiles containing the raw data the code draws from, and one readme.txt file.
This version contains updated code for the analyses of error rate, using a binomial rather than a gamma family for GLM model fitting.00_README.txttext/plainAnalysisCode.RmdRStudio analysis file that is set up to allow those accessing this dataset to easily examine how analysis was done.application/octet-streamAnalysisCode.txtA .txt file containing the analysis code from R for error rate and response timetext/plainExp00a_eventdata_merged.txtRaw eye tracking data from the bimanual response setuptext/plainExp00b_eventdata_merged.txtRaw eye tracking data from the unimanual response setuptext/plainExp00_RTanalyzedTrials.txtData file associated with eye tracking analysistext/plainEyeTracking.RmdRStudio analysis file for eyetracking data that is set up to allow those accessing this dataset to easily examine how analysis was done.application/octet-streamEyeTracking.txtR code written out in a .txt filetext/plainFriPro_EXP00A.txtRaw data from the bimanual response setuptext/plainFriPro_EXP00B.txtRaw data from the unimanual response setuptext/plain