View: |
Part 1: Document Description
|
Citation |
|
---|---|
Title: |
Aspect and prefixation in Old Church Slavonic |
Identification Number: |
doi:10.18710/3YNHO7 |
Distributor: |
DataverseNO |
Date of Distribution: |
2015-03-30 |
Version: |
1 |
Bibliographic Citation: |
Eckhoff, Hanne; Haug, Dag, 2015, "Aspect and prefixation in Old Church Slavonic", https://doi.org/10.18710/3YNHO7, DataverseNO, V1 |
Citation |
|
Title: |
Aspect and prefixation in Old Church Slavonic |
Identification Number: |
doi:10.18710/3YNHO7 |
Authoring Entity: |
Eckhoff, Hanne (UiT The Arctic University of Norway) |
Haug, Dag (University of Oslo) |
|
Producer: |
UiT The Arctic University of Norway |
University of Oslo |
|
Distributor: |
DataverseNO |
Distributor: |
The Tromsø Repository of Language and Linguistics (TROLLing) |
Access Authority: |
Eckhoff, Hanne |
Date of Deposit: |
2014-12-19 |
Holdings Information: |
https://doi.org/10.18710/3YNHO7 |
Study Scope |
|
Keywords: |
Arts and Humanities, aspect |
Topic Classification: |
Time-depth: diachronic, Field: Semantics, Topic: aspect, Topic: affixes, Topic: verbs, Time-depth: synchronic |
Abstract: |
In this article we focus on one grammaticalization path to perfective markers, that of the so-called "bounder perfectives" (Bybee and Dahl 1989). Systems with this kind of perfective markers - often called "Slavic-style aspect" -- are particular elaborated in the Slavic languages. To examine why this is the case, we study the long-disputed question of the semantic relationship between the inflectional aspectual system inherited from PIE and the emerging affixation-based verb pair system in expressing aspect in Old Church Slavonic (OCS), using parallel Greek and OCS data from the PROIEL corpus. Previous researchers have made extremely conflicting claims about this relationship, some seeing the inflectional system as the main exponent of aspect, others seeing the affixation system as the main exponent of aspect. Our statistical study of the data shows rather that the OCS system attests an interesting language stage where there are two partially overlapping exponents of aspect. By firmly establishing the facts of the synchronic OCS system, we can look both backwards and forwards. We argue that Slavic "bounder perfectives" owe their advanced development to their coexistence with the old inflectional aspect system. We also argue that the well-known interactions between the two aspectual systems in Bulgarian, which still retains both, are probably a later development. |
Country: |
Norway |
Kind of Data: |
corpus |
Methodology and Processing |
|
Sources Statement |
|
Data Access |
|
Other Study Description Materials |
|
Label: |
file_description_2.txt |
Text: |
Detailed descriptions of all the supplementary files. |
Notes: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII |
Label: |
supplementA.csv |
Text: |
Comma-separated data set for the study |
Notes: |
text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
Label: |
supplementB.pdf |
Text: |
Visualisation of stem-based verb families |
Notes: |
application/pdf |
Label: |
supplementC.pdf |
Text: |
Visualisation of verbs sorted by Greek source verb |
Notes: |
application/pdf |
Label: |
supplementD.csv |
Text: |
Aspectual classification of OCS verbs |
Notes: |
text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
Label: |
supplementE.txt |
Text: |
OCS aspectual pairs |
Notes: |
text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
Label: |
supplementF.csv |
Text: |
Classification of atelic neutral aorists/past participles |
Notes: |
text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
Label: |
supplementG.pdf |
Text: |
OCS vs. Old Russian aspect classifications |
Notes: |
application/pdf |
Label: |
To read the Church Slavonic transcriptions.pdf |
Text: |
Information on how to display the Church Slavonic transcriptions correctly |
Notes: |
application/pdf |