<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><metadata xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns="http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/"><dcterms:title>Supplementary data for: A systems thinking governance framework for large-scale sustainability synthesis</dcterms:title><dcterms:identifier>https://doi.org/10.18710/NZHGW3</dcterms:identifier><dcterms:creator>Barahmand, Zahir</dcterms:creator><dcterms:publisher>DataverseNO</dcterms:publisher><dcterms:issued>2026-02-26</dcterms:issued><dcterms:modified>2026-04-22T06:26:58Z</dcterms:modified><dcterms:description>This dataset supports the paper “A Governance-Aware Systems Thinking Architecture for Sustainability at Scale.” The study addresses a key challenge in large-scale sustainability research: how to ensure transparency, consistency, and auditability when integrating heterogeneous evidence and systems thinking approaches.

The paper introduces STAI³RS, a governance framework designed to ensure rigor and reproducibility in sustainability synthesis. STAI³RS stands for Scalable, Transparent, Analytical, Interpretable, Reliable, Reproducible, Robust, and Systematic, and provides cross-cutting principles and procedural cues for applying systems thinking methods at scale.

Building on this governance layer, the paper presents SEEDS (Systems Evidence Extraction and Decision Support), a six-component operational model that structures sustainability synthesis from problem framing to decision support. SEEDS integrates boundary governance, evidence extraction, harmonization, synthesis, and iterative learning into a transparent and auditable workflow.

The dataset includes materials that document the governance diagnostics and operational implementation of these frameworks. In particular, Table S2 presents a case study demonstrating the SEEDS workflow in practice through a large-scale feedstock evidence mapping study spanning over 130,000 peer-reviewed studies across biomass- and waste-to-X conversion technologies. This case study illustrates how governance rules, audit trails, and harmonization procedures enable reproducible synthesis across three large scientific corpora. 

SEEDS_components_in_practice

These materials support reuse, verification, and extension of governance-aware systems thinking approaches in sustainability research and decision support.</dcterms:description><dcterms:subject>Engineering</dcterms:subject><dcterms:subject>systems thinking model</dcterms:subject><dcterms:subject>sustainability</dcterms:subject><dcterms:subject>large-scale study</dcterms:subject><dcterms:subject>strategic decision-making</dcterms:subject><dcterms:language>English</dcterms:language><dcterms:IsSupplementTo>Submitted for review</dcterms:IsSupplementTo><dcterms:date>2026-02-26</dcterms:date><dcterms:contributor>Barahmand, Zahir</dcterms:contributor><dcterms:contributor>Eikeland, Marianne</dcterms:contributor><dcterms:contributor>Wang, Liang</dcterms:contributor><dcterms:contributor>Heirati, Nima</dcterms:contributor><dcterms:dateSubmitted>2026-02-25</dcterms:dateSubmitted><dcterms:temporal>2026-01-15</dcterms:temporal><dcterms:temporal>2026-02-20</dcterms:temporal><dcterms:relation>Barahmand Zahir; Eikeland Marianne Sørflaten, 2025, "Dataset and code supplement: Mapping gasification technologies and feedstocks with a dual validated large-scale literature-derived dataset", https://doi.org/10.23642/USN.30546347, DataverseNO, V1</dcterms:relation><dcterms:relation>Barahmand Zahir, 2025, "Supplementary code and curated data for 1,863 experimental gasification studies (laboratory to commercial scale)", https://doi.org/10.23642/USN.30702092, DataverseNO, V1</dcterms:relation><dcterms:relation>Barahmand, Zahir, 2026, "Label system, dictionaries, and audit evidence for harmonised over 133,000 feedstock items across major conversion technologies", https://doi.org/10.18710/WEZMJE, DataverseNO, V1</dcterms:relation><dcterms:relation>Barahmand, Zahir, 2026, "Supplementary dataset and reproducible codes for LLM-assisted mapping feedstocks of eight conversion technologies from over 121,000 studies", https://doi.org/10.18710/JM6U7B, DataverseNO, V1</dcterms:relation><dcterms:type>diagnostic matrix</dcterms:type><dcterms:type>Used systems thinking model references</dcterms:type><dcterms:type>SEEDS components in a case study</dcterms:type><dcterms:source>21 systems thinking models are collected narratively from literature</dcterms:source><dcterms:license>CC BY 4.0</dcterms:license></metadata>