Die mentale Repräsentation von Aspektpartnerschaften russischer Verben

Version 1.2
Clasmeier, Christina, 2015, "Die mentale Repräsentation von Aspektpartnerschaften russischer Verben", https://doi.org/10.18710/R2SZVK, DataverseNO, V1
Learn about Data Citation Standards.
Contact Owner Share
Dataset Metrics
257 Downloads
Description
Kaum eine sprachliche Struktur des Russischen wird so kontrovers diskutiert wie der Verbalaspekt: Welche Verben können Aspektkorrelationen bilden? Was gilt als Aspektpaar? Zu diesen und anderen Fragen geben Aspektolog/innen eine Vielzahl verschiedener Antworten. Aber wie ist die komplexe Kategorie in den Köpfen der Russischsprecher/innen selbst verankert? Diese Perspektive und damit eine psycholinguistische Herangehensweise wird in dem vorliegenden Buch aufgegriffen. Im Zentrum der Monographie stehen zwei empirisch-experimentelle Untersuchungen mit mehr als hundert erwachsenen Russischsprecher/innen. Das Spektrum der verwendeten Methoden erstreckt sich von der Korpusanalyse über die Arbeit mit Pseudowörtern bis hin zu Kategorisierungsverfahren. Die Ergebnisse der Untersuchungen lassen die Grundzüge einer mentalen Repräsentation des Aspekts erkennen, die am besten mit funktional orientierten Aspekttheorien kongruiert. Nicht nur telische Ereignisverben wie otkryt’ (pf) – otkryvat’ (ipf) ,öffnenʻ, sondern auch atelische Verlaufsverben wie plakat’ (ipf) ,weinenʻ mit ihren po- und za-präfigierten Derivaten werden von den befragten Personen als grammatische Aspektkorrelationen wahrgenommen. Überhaupt gehört das Partnerbildungsverfahren der Präfigierung offenbar ebenso fest zur mentalen Repräsentation des Aspekts wie die Suffigierung, es genießt sogar eine besondere Prominenz. In dieser Datenbank werden die der Monographie zugrunde liegenden Daten zur Korpusanalyse von 500 russischen Verben, zum Pseudopartnerexperiment und zum Kartenexperiment zur Verfügung gestellt. (2015-08-17)
Subject Arts and Humanities
Keyword verbal aspect, Russian, psycholinguistics, experiment, corpus
Related Publication Clasmeier, Christina 2015. Die mentale Repräsentation von Aspektpartnerschaften russischer Verben. Slavolinguistica 21. München. doi: 10.3726/b11862
License/Data Use Agreement

CC0 1.0

Filter by
1 to 2 of 2 Files
data_pseudo partner experiment_analysis by participants and by items separate for procedures.ods
Unknown - 22.9 KB
Published Aug 31, 2015
10 Downloads
MD5: dc8b50445e6bd6c4b1beeb495b98c823
The pseudo partner experiment was developed to investigate the mental representation of formal properties of Russian aspectual pairs. Participants were confronted with 25 existing Russian verbs and 25 invented pseudo verbs of different morphemic types (base form, prefixed form, po-prefixed form, prefixed and suffixed form, nu-suffixed form), e.g. *zurat’. Each stimulus was presented visually on a computer screen. Participants were asked to 1) read the word or pseudo word aloud 2) determine the verb’s aspectual subcategory (pf. or ipf.), in case of the pseudo verbs based on their linguistic intuition and 3) naming the stimulus’ aspectual partner, respectively, in case of the pseudo verbs forming an appropriate partner by manipulating the stimulus. Both reactions to words and pseudo words were analyzed, but given the fact that aspectual pairs for existing Russian verbs are certain, reactions to pseudo words are much more interesting and therefore in the focus of this investigation. The participants’ aspectual classifications of the stimuli and their pseudo partner proposals were analyzed regarding their appropriateness. What is appropriate, of course, differs among morphemic types, so for each morphemic type specific hypotheses were formulated, based on a corpus analysis of 500 Russian verbs. Furthermore, partner proposals were examined with respect to the type of manipulation, e.g. taking a prefix off, adding a prefix, adding a suffix et cetera. This file contains some extracted data from the file data_Pseudopartnerexperiment_60participants.csv. I have provided them additionally because I refer to them in a separate chapter of my book (4.2.4.10 Probanden- und Itemanalyse). While the mentioned file (data_Pseudopartnerexperiment_60participants.csv) provides raw data, the information given by this additional file is based on the analysis and interpretation of the raw data. Its purpose is to ensure that the main tendencies resulting from the data analysis are not influenced by a minority of participants or items. Checking this question separately is necessary because it is not taken into account by the applied statistical method itself (chi-square-test). The first five sheets (P_) contain information on the number of participants who have made use, at least once, of the main procedures of generating an aspectual pseudo partner. Participants are counted separately for each of the five main procedures (1. taking a prefix off, 2. adding a prefix, 3. adding a suffix, 4. breaking a suffix off and 5. changing a suffix) resulting in five lists of different lengths. The sheets 6-11 (I_) take the opposite perspective. For each item (in column A, stem ID in column B) used in the experiment the table shows how often each procedure of generating an aspectual pseudo partner (columns C-L) was chosen by the participants. Column M gives the total number of analyzed reactions. Column N gives the percentage of the taking off/adding a prefix procedures, because manipulating a prefix was found to be an unexpectedly popular procedure applied by the participants for the purpose of generating an aspectual pair with given pseudo verbs. There are separate sheets for each morphemic type (absolute simplicia, prefixed form, po-prefixed form, prefixed and suffixed form, nu-suffixed form, total).
Pseudo partner experiment
data_card experiment_analysis of distances.ods
Unknown - 22.7 KB
Published Aug 31, 2015
18 Downloads
MD5: 0129d185f7f64bde41ed17590e37c6d0
This file contains the data referred to in chapter 5.5.2 (Die Bedeutsamkeit des Unterschieds zwischen Aspektpartnern) of my thesis. An experiment called "card experiment" (Kartenexperiment) was developed for the purpose of investigating firstly the functional and semantic differences Russian native speakers assign to the members of an aspectual pair and secondly the significance they adjudge to this difference. Especially the latter (i.e. significance of the semantic difference between the members of an aspectual pair, e.g. on otkryl - on otkryval) was examined through the comparison of differences between other grammatical forms (e.g. differing in gender or tense) and pairs of words related by lexical word formation (e.g. on otkryl - otkryvalka). The experiment is called "card experiment" because the participants were confronted with ten pairs of cards, each of which was imprinted with a word form from the same word family (4 versions of the experiment with 4 different word families exist: otkryt’, prosit’, plakat’, polozhit’). One of the cards from each pair was imprinted with the so-called "anchor form" (on otkryl, on prosil, on plakal, on polozhil). The form printed on the second card from each pair varied. It was either another grammatical (among these the aspectual) form from the same verb or a lexical derivative. The participants’ task was to go through all of the word pairs, firstly to describe the functional and/or semantic differences between their meanings and secondly to position the cards from each pair in a certain distance, so as to symbolize the significance assigned to the meaning difference by the participant. For a meaning difference of low significance participants were supposed to place the cards in a small distance, accordingly, for a difference of higher significance the distance between the two cards was expected to be bigger (for a more detailed description of the study design see chapter 5.2 (Untersuchungskonzeption) of my thesis). 121 adult Russian native speakers took part in this experiment. The participants’ work was recorded by a camera. I analyzed the final picture and established a rank order of distance sizes (1-10). The first, second, third and fourth sheets of this file (ordered by word family) contain the resulting raw data, i.e. the rank orders for each participant. Column A gives the participants’ ID. Columns B-K contain the ranks for each word pair, entitled by their relationship. Identical columns for all sheets are: Gender (B), infinitive (C) and tense (D). The positions of mood, participle, verbal noun, aspect (in case of plakat’ this relationship requires three columns for three different prefixed derivatives) and individual lexical derivatives differ among the 4 word families. Equal distances are treated with equal (mean) ranks. The fifth sheet of this file contains the results of the descriptive analysis, separately for each word family. The most important values (bold face type) are the median and the interquartile range for each word pair relationship. The last row of each section (12, 25, 38, 51) gives an interpretation of the interquartile range based upon a study by Krause (2002)*. * Krause, M. 2002. Subjektive Bewertung von Vorkommenshäufigkeiten. Methode und Ergebnisse. In: Glottometrics 2, 53-81.
card experiment
Edit File

This file has already been deleted (or replaced) in the current version. It may not be edited.

Restrict Access

Restricting limits access to published files. People who want to use the restricted files can request access by default. If you disable request access, you must add information about access to the Terms of Access field.

Learn about restricting files and dataset access in the User Guide.

Enable access request
You must enable request access or add terms of access to restrict file access.
Save Changes
Edit Embargo

The selected file or files have already been published. Contact an administrator to change the embargo date or reason of the file or files.
Edit Retention Period

The selected file or files have already been published. Contact an administrator to change the retention period date or reason of the file or files.
Delete Files

The file will be deleted after you click on the Delete button.

Files will not be removed from previously published versions of the dataset.

Select File(s)

Please select one or more files.

Share Dataset

Share this dataset on your favorite social media networks.

Continue
Dataset Citations

Citations for this dataset are retrieved from Crossref via DataCite using Make Data Count standards. For more information about dataset metrics, please refer to the User Guide.

Sorry, no citations were found.
Inaccessible Files Selected

The selected file(s) may not be downloaded because you have not been granted access or the file(s) have a retention period that has expired or the files can only be transferred via Globus.

You may request access to any restricted file(s) by clicking the Request Access button.

Ineligible Files Selected

The selected file(s) may not be transferred because you have not been granted access or the file(s) have a retention period that has expired or the files are not Globus accessible.

You may request access to any restricted file(s) by clicking the Request Access button.

Download Options

The files selected are too large to download as a ZIP.

You can select individual files that are below the 4.7 GB download limit from the files table, or use the Data Access API for programmatic access to the files.

Select File(s)

Please select a file or files to be downloaded.

Inaccessible Files Selected

The selected file(s) may not be downloaded because you have not been granted access or the file(s) have a retention period that has expired.

Click Continue to download the files you have access to download.

Ineligible Files Selected

Some file(s) cannot be transferred. (They are restricted, embargoed, with an expired retention period, or not Globus accessible.)

Click Continue to transfer the elligible files.

Delete Dataset

Are you sure you want to delete this dataset and all of its files? You cannot undelete this dataset.

Delete Draft Version

Are you sure you want to delete this draft version? Files will be reverted to the most recently published version. You cannot undelete this draft.

Unpublished Dataset Private URL

Private URL can only be used with unpublished versions of datasets.

Unpublished Dataset Private URL

Are you sure you want to disable the Private URL? If you have shared the Private URL with others they will no longer be able to use it to access your unpublished dataset.

Delete Files

The file(s) will be deleted after you click on the Delete button.

Files will not be removed from previously published versions of the dataset.

Compute

This dataset contains restricted files you may not compute on because you have not been granted access.

Deaccession Dataset

Are you sure you want to deaccession? This is permanent and the selected version(s) will no longer be viewable by the public.

Deaccession Dataset

Are you sure you want to deaccession this dataset? This is permanent an it will no longer be viewable by the public.

Version Differences Details

Please select two versions to view the differences.

Version Differences Details
 
Version:
Last Updated:
Version:
Last Updated:
Select File(s)

Please select a file or files for access request.

Select File(s)

Embargoed files cannot be accessed. Please select an unembargoed file or files for your access request.

Edit Tags

Select existing file tags or create new tags to describe your files. Each file can have more than one tag.

Request Access

  You need to Log In to request access.

Dataset Terms

Please confirm and/or complete the information needed below in order to request access to files in this dataset.

This dataset is made available under the following terms. Please confirm and/or complete the information needed below in order to continue.

Our Community Norms as well as good scientific practices expect that proper credit is given via citation. Please use the data citation shown on the dataset page.

CC0 1.0

Preview Guestbook

Upon downloading files the guestbook asks for the following information.

Account Information

Package File Download

Use the Download URL in a Wget command or a download manager to download this package file. Download via web browser is not recommended. User Guide - Downloading a Dataverse Package via URL

https://dataverse.no/api/access/datafile/

Compute Batch
Clear Batch
Dataset Persistent Identifier Change Compute Batch
Compute Batch
Submit for Review

You will not be able to make changes to this dataset while it is in review.

Publish Dataset

Are you sure you want to republish this dataset?

Select if this is a minor or major version update.

Publish Dataset

This dataset cannot be published until TROLLing is published by its administrator.

Publish Dataset

This dataset cannot be published until TROLLing and DataverseNO are published.

Return to Author

Return this dataset to contributor for modification.